Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078
Original file (BC 2013 03078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03078
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 26 Jul 11 and 26 Oct 11 be 
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS). 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a pre-existing medical condition, Asthma that was not yet 
under control and precluded him from obtaining an overall 
satisfactory rating on the contested FAs.  

In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical 
Determination” letter, signed by his medical provider on 11 Sep 
12, which states he “had a documented medical condition that 
precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt 
portion of the FA test; and multiple standard FM 600s, 
Chronological Record of Medical Care, indicating that he has 
Asthma and would be undergoing a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date of the contested FAs the applicant was serving in 
the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).

On 26 Jul 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 35.70, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following component scores:  Cardio – 18:52/0.00, Abdominal 
Circumference – 33.50”/20.00 points, Push-ups – 45/7.70 points, 
Sit-ups – 47/8.00 points.

On 26 Oct 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 42.30, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following component scores:  Cardio – 16:49/8.30, Abdominal 
Circumference – 34.50”/20.00 points, Push-ups – 45/7.70 points, 
Sit-ups – 43/6.30 points.

A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: 

Date 
Composite Score
Cardio
Rating
19 Aug 13
88.75
Exempt
Satisfactory
13 May 13
35.60
15:45/0.00
Exempt
8 Nov 12
92.00
Exempt
Excellent
14 Aug 12
28.80
18:01/0.00
Unsatisfactory
16 Feb 12
91.75
Exempt
Excellent
*26 Nov 11
42.30
16:49/8.30
Unsatisfactory
*26 Jul 11
35.70
18:52/0.00
Unsatisfactory
31 Jan 11
84.00
Exempt
Satisfactory
25 Nov 10
27.50
Incomplete/0.00
Unsatisfactory
24 May 10
78.00
13:11/36.00
Good
*Contested FA

On 14 Feb 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the 
Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “The applicant 
had a pre-existing injury that was validated by medical, but 
there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the 
Fitness Assessment.”

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change the contested FAs in AFFMS due to lack of supporting 
evidence.  DPSIM states, the applicant provided a memorandum 
from his Primary Care Manager (PCM) supporting his claim. 
However, he did not provide documentation from the Unit 
Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA in 
accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (AFGM5), paragraph 
13, dated 20 Dec 10.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was 
forwarded to the applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment 
within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received 
by this office (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we believe he has met his burden of 
establishing the contested FAs should be declared void. The Air 
Force Office of primary responsibility (OPR) recommends denial 
of the request due to a lack of supporting evidence.  The FAAB 
denied the request stating that while there was evidence to 
support his medical condition, there was no indication the 
commander wanted to invalidate the contested FAs.  While we note 
an invalidation letter from the commander was not submitted, we 
recognize the medical documents and the “Medical Determination 
Letter” from his medical provider, indicating that he had a  
pre-existing condition of asthma, which precluded him from 
passing the contested FAs.  In view of this, we find a totality 
of the evidence supports favorable consideration of this 
request. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the 
Fitness Assessments, dated 26 Jul 11 and 26 Oct 11 be declared 
void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-03078 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Jun 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443

    Original file (BC 2013 05443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical Determination” letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502

    Original file (BC 2013 02502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441

    Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04717

    Original file (BC 2013 04717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s last 5 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating *22 Jul 13 18.88 35/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Mar 13 59.63 38/47.70 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep 12 79.78 39/49.80 Satisfactory 24 Feb 12 78.33 41/47.20 Satisfactory 19 Aug 11 86.00 44/52.40 Satisfactory *Contested FA An AF Form 108, dated 4 Sep 13, signed by his medical provider, states “the member has been evaluated and has a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing score.” On 20 Feb 14, a similar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03350

    Original file (BC 2013 03350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. On 7 Apr 14 the applicant submitted a letter from his commander, with attachments, requesting that the contested FA be removed from the record (Exhibit C). However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...